![]() |
"(Porn Valley Observed is) the smartest and funniest coverage of the adult industry you will read." - About.com |
|
Apr 5, 2006
The Contractor
Studio: Adam & EveDirector: Daniel Dakota Cast: Carmen Luvana, Austyn Moore, Charmane Star, Taryn Thomas, Evan Stone, Randy Spears, Barrett Blade Daniel Dakota’s unflinching vision of sex in the building trades is as potent now as when it was filmed over three days in August of 2005. Carmen Luvana, Austyn Moore, and Charmane Star prove that a working class hero is still something to be. “Hey man, what’s so interesting about this house?” Cut to Luvana, Moore, Star, and Thomas walking abreast in slow motion, laden down with tools and boobies. “Whoa!” If I were the type of person to snap you with a towel, I would say: “Bro, it doesn’t get any better than this.” Luvana is a building contractor who is pressed for time. Her employees keep having sex on the job. They are concerned about her because “she really needs to get laid.” In addition to Luvana’s obvious frigidity, her client is pressuring her to finish the house in two weeks and the building inspector has a list of violations. “You’d better fucking get this done,” Luvana says to her employees, “and come up with a stragety.” The stragety involves shots of backhoes being operated on different days than the shots featuring the porn stars controlling them. There are also several scenes in which actors having a conversation were clearly not on set at the same time. Along with the most obvious instance of dubbing I have ever seen in a movie made in America, “The Contractor” is a national treasure. The only thing that could possibly make this movie better would be if the cast was naked. And it is. The delightfully squishy cover girl Austyn Moore pairs up twice, once with the machine-crafted Luvana. Taryn Thomas enjoys a backhoe scene with the dubbed male talent, and Charmane Star services the nervous client, Randy Spears, who alternates with Evan Stone (also in the movie) as The Porn Actor Who Most Blatantly Loves His Job. It is the studied opinion of this reviewer that what would in other films be blatant errors in lighting, sound, script, direction, and logistics only add to The Contractor‘s value. Upon completing their job after a well-deserved sandpit hose fight (!), the girls settle their differences and are approached by a mysterious stranger to do a job for $10 million. Is this a setup for The Contractor 2? That is where your narrow sensibilities would lead you, maybe, but repeated viewings really opened my eyes. Dakota is a trickster, so I wouldn’t be surprised if he upends our unenlightened sensibilities and this cast never works together again. One thing is certain: Masons are hottt. ¶ 4/05/2006 |
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement This Website fully complies with 18 U.S.C. 2256 and 2257 and the regulations promulgated thereunder. The owners and operators of this Website are secondary producers and are not the primary producer (as defined in 18 U.S.C. 2257) of any of the visual content contained in this Website. All models, actors, actresses and other persons that appear in any visual depiction of actual or simulated sexually explicit conduct appearing or otherwise contained in this Website were over the age of eighteen years at the time of the creation of such depictions. All other pictures, graphics, videos or other visual media displayed on this Website are exempt from the provision of 18 U.S.C. 2257 (a) through (c) and 28 C.F.R. 75 because the pictures, graphics, videos or other visual media: (1) do not consist of depictions of sexually explicit conduct, but are merely depictions of non-sexually explicit nudity, (2) contains only visual depictions of actual sexually explicit conduct made before July 3, 1995, or is produced, manufactured, published, duplicated, reproduced, or reissued before July 3, 1995; (3) contains only visual depictions of simulated sexually explicit conduct; (4) contains some combination of visual depictions described in (2) and (3) above; (5) have been certified by its primary producer to the operators of this Website (as secondary producers) to satisfy the standards under (2) through (4) above. |