logo
reviews about contact links advertise galleries media
--Monday, December 05, 2005--

Non-Arthur Brown-related world

Our beatific beautician friend Heather Veitch was written up in the London Telegraph and Irish Independent for her work bringing porners to Jesus in articles titled "Ex-stripper spreads God's word to sleazy world of porno".

Nothing like laying it on thick. Do you need the word "sleazy" when writing about "porno"? I have worked at publications where the word "porno" is prohibited in the style (ha ha) guide because "porno" sounds sleazy where "porn" and "adult" do not, or do not, as much.

Or perhaps the papers believe that parts of the porno world are not sleazy, and that Veitch and JC's Girls are ministering only to the decadent part of it?

If so, which parts of the porno world are not sleazy?

posted by Gram the Man at

1 Comments:
Anonymous El Cheapo said...
If so, which parts of the porno world are not sleazy?

Craft services?
Monday, December 05, 2005  
Post a Comment Links to this post:
Create a Link << Home
Spread the Gram
s goog Add to Mixx! Delicious s

While GramPonante.com is written for a tenth-grade reading level (in some countries), you must be 18 years or older to visit this site. Sorry.

prpotw

thirdworldxxx
rss
goog
tla
  •  


     

    CCOPY mavmed responsible rss google